Sunday, October 1, 2023

T.P. Kailasam’s The Curse of Karna

 

T.P. Kailasam’s

The Curse or Karna 




Hello Everyone…!

This blog is a task assigned by megha ma'am, Department of English M.K.B.U. This blog deals with several assigned questions based on T.P.Kailasam's "The Curse of Karna".


T.P.Kailasam



Thyagaraja Paramasiva Kailasam is a popular figure in the Kannada theater scene. He was born in the year 1884, and was a playwright of eminence. He contributed greatly towards Kannada literature. He was so popular in the Kannada theater that he earned the title Prahasana Prapitamaha, "the father of humorous plays".


Early Life of T. P. Kailasam



Kailasam was born in a Tamil family in southern Karnataka, in the year 1884. He received his higher education in England. T. Parameswara Iyer, his father, was employed with the Mysore state service and was the younger brother of Madras High Court judge, Sir T. Sadasiva Iyer. T. P. Kailasam came from a family of scholars and professional people. While he was in England for higher education, he spent several times in theaters and attending classes and participating in many plays.


After his return from London, he took up a job at government geology service. He did his job seriously and prospered well. But soon, he lost interest and shed his former lifestyle and began living as a nocturnal bohemian, writing plays.


Here are some famous works written by him-


  • ToLLu Gatti or MakkaLiskool Manelalwe? (ಟೊಳ್ಳು ಗಟ್ಟಿ)
  • Poli Kitti, The Story of a born scout (ಪೋಲಿ ಕಿಟ್ಟಿ)
  • Bahishkara (ಬಹಿಷ್ಕಾರ)
  • HomeRoolu (ಹೋ೦ರೂಲು)
  • Gandaskatri (ಗಂಡಸ್ಕತ್ರಿ)
  • Vaidyana Vyadhi (ವೈದ್ಯನ ವ್ಯಾಧಿ)
  • TaLikattokkooline? ( ತಾಳಿಕಟ್ಟೋಕ್ಕೂಲಿನೇ)
  • Huttadalli Hutta (Waels Within Weals) (ಹುತ್ತದಲ್ಲಿ ಹುತ್ತ)
  • BandvaLvillada Badayi (ಬಂಡ್ವಾಳ್ವಿಲ್ಲದ ಬಡಾಯಿ)
  • Ammavra Ganda (ಅಮ್ಮಾವ್ರ ಗಂಡ)
  • Seekarne Saavitri (ಸೀಕರ್ಣೆ ಸಾವಿತ್ರಿ)
  • Sattavana Santhaapa (ಸತ್ತವನ ಸಂತಾಪ)
  • AnukoolakkobaNNa (ಅನುಕೂಲಕ್ಕೊಬ್ಬಣ್ಣ)
  • Namkampni (ನಮ್ ಕಂಪನಿ)
  • NamkLabbu (ನಮ್ಕ್ಳಬ್ಬು)
  • NammBramhaNkay (ನಮ್ಮ್ ಬ್ರಾಹ್ಮಣ್ಕೆ)
  • SooLe (Murder O' Mercy) (ಸೂಳೆ)

English

  • Fulfilment

  • Purpose

  • The Brahmin's Curse

Kailasam's plays are known for their social realism, humor, and sharp wit. He was a pioneer of modern Kannada theater, and his works continue to be popular and performed today.

Kailasam was a moralist, but he had the subtlety needed to carry off his moralizing. His appreciation of what was really noble in traditional ways of living, added a grace to his plays. He gave the spoken language the status of literature. He created the new vogue for the satirical social play which proved that powerful prose with penetrating humor could do away with tinsel attractions of music, setting and costume.


T. P. Kailasam died in the city of Bengaluru in the state of Karnataka in 1946.




The Curse or Karna



Karna is the son of Surya and Kunti and the doyen of archers, endures a challenging journey on his way to becoming one of the greatest warriors of the Mahabharata. His Foster parents were Sootha Radha and Adirath. The story of Karna begins with the misfortune of his secret birth and unfolds itself amidst the unremitting gloom of injustice and insult. Karna was lodged in the section reserved for ordinary pupils and away from the section reserved for princes and other high caste students. The Curse or Karna is one of the best known works of Kailasam. This story is from Karna’s perspective. Here we get to see Karna as a hero of Mahabharat. He was the one who in spite of being of high class society had to face all the shame of being in lower caste. In every step of his life he has been cursed for being a Sootha. In ancient times society was divided into 4 categories based on their work (karma) but slowly with time it changed and everyone had to do work based on birth. In this case lower birth talent was never counted and was cursed. Same happened with Karna. In Mahabharat he is always shown as a supporting character. We never knew in detail about the pains of his life. T.P. Kailasam in this work has tried to bring Karna as a hero and brought to us pains of his life. 


The story of Karna is the intriguing story of a hero who despite being born to royalty was brought up lovingly by a lowly charioteer and his wife, his whole life was one great struggle against cruel destiny and all the odds placed in his way by the inequities of his time.


Q-1 Karna - The Voice of subaltern.



The story of Karna begins with the misfortune of his secret birth and unfolds itself amidst the unremitting gloom of injustice and insult. A long time ago, a beautiful young princess named Kunti lived with her Uncle, King Kuntibhoj, in a lovely palace along the banks of a wide river. One day Maharishi Durvasa visited the palace of Kuntibhoja. He stayed there for almost a year. During his stay Kunti was given the responsibility of attending to his needs. Kunti served the Maharishi with great reverence without caring for her own comfort. The sage had a very peaceful and happy stay and wanted to reward Kunti for her services. Maharishi said, 


“Child, one day you will need the help of the Gods. I am going to teach you a secret mantra for inviting the Gods into your life. Be very careful with this mantra! Use it wisely.”


Early the next morning Kunti was playing by herself in the royal garden. The sun had risen and Kunti watched its rays touch a flower here, a leaf there. She felt its warmth on her skin. She thought about the Sun God waking up the whole world. Forgetting her promise to Durvasa, she began to recite the mantra. She closed her eyes and concentrated the way she had been taught to summon the Sun-God Surya who is compelled to give her a child, fearful that a child conceived before marriage may ruin her reputation, Kunti places the child- born with natural armor and divine earrings- in a wicker basket. She coated the basket with the wax to make it waterproof, and lined it with layers of the silk to make it soft and warm. She placed the baby carefully in his new bed and carried the basket to the river. 



Then she kissed him good-bye and set the basket afloat and whispered, “May the Sun-God watch over you always and keep you safe. May you find parents who will love you and care for you.” Downstream, Adhiratha was sitting on a rock, hoping to catch a fish for the midday meal. He was a gentleman, a charioteer by trade, and his wife Radha was a gentle and good woman. They were often sad, however, for they were unable to have children. Adhiratha cast the line out over the river and sighed again, he waded out into the current and caught hold of the basket. His surprise knew no bounds when he discovered the sleeping newborn baby inside the boat. When Radha saw the tiny baby lying peacefully asleep, she was overjoyed and said to her husband, 


“Swamy, it seems that our prayers have been answered. We will keep this baby and bring him up as our own”. 


He replied I agree with you. He is a gift from God in answer to our prayers. In fact, he himself is Godlike with these divine earrings and armor. After consultation with the Brahmins, he was named Vasushena since he was wearing a Vasu Varma. He also came to be known as Radheya or the son of Radha, and more famously as Karna (signifying ear, because he was born with the divine earrings). Radheya was outgrowing like every other young boy of his age in the village. With his special features and personality, anybody could see that the boy did not quite belong to the category of ordinary village lads. Because of his strength and skills at any kind of game, nobody would mess up with him and he became a natural leader in the village. Although he soon lost interest in the games that other boys played, while at home he would shape beautiful clay toys. Outside the home he would be interested in wrestling or cutting stout branches of trees, shaping them into bows and arrows and shooting them at imaginary targets. 



Seeing his son in such a getup Adhiratha decided to provide him a formal education. Adhiratha was particularly tense, as he recalled how Dronacharya had initially refused to do anything with a Suta Putra (charioteer’s son), and how he had to seek the intervention of King Dhritarashtra himself. Even after the royal intercession, Guru Dronacharya had only agreed to impart basic education and training in arms to his son. In due course both father and son entered the hut 

of Guru Dronacharya and touched his feet with due reverence. Karna was lodged in the section reserved for ordinary pupils and away from the section reserved for princes and other high caste students. 


After a few days when Adhiratha visited his son in his lodgings, he found him tense and somewhat angry as well. Before entering the room he had assured him that his son was very bright and a quick learner. But on entering the room he found him in a different frame of mind which made him apprehensive. On being asked, Karna started asking all sorts of questions with his father. He asked, 


“Baba, is it a crime to be a Suta-Putra? Why do scriptures sanction this class-based discrimination? Why should the princes and other so-called upper-class students be given better food, better lodgings, and better education as compared to students like me, who seem to have an inborn stigma attached to their names? Where does my fault lie in all this?”


Similarly, this scenario is also denoted by the term ‘subaltern’ conventionally denotes an inferior military rank, it is more generally used as ‘a name for the general attribute of subordination in South Asian society’ often expressed in terms of caste and gender as it is being acquired at birth and is non-changeable. 


The term ‘Subaltern’ was coined by Ranjit Guha and later it was adopted by Marxist Antonio Gramsci and further it was discussed by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak in her essay ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ People consider Subaltern as the unrepresented group of people in the society, people of inferior race, not fit for making any real contribution to the society and therefore they cannot speak, but in reality subaltern can speak but others do not have the patience to listen to them and same can be seen with Karna, he is capable but he ultimately he is Suta Putra.


To console Karna Adhiratha sensibly replied,


“My dear son, during your education you will surely study 

scriptures and find out for yourself that they don’t sanction any kind of discrimination. These divisions are all manmade and tools used by those people who wield power to subjugate those who are weak and less fortunate. Let me assure you, my son, being a Suta is not a crime. We earn our living by fair means and struggle hard to make both ends meet. Be assured there is no dishonor involved in all this. But you and I are not in a position to change the system. My advice to you is that you can earn recognition by hard work and dedication and outshine everyone with your superior capabilities. For that, you have to work very hard and convert your anger into the will to overcome the handicap of discrimination. I am sure one day you would achieve such heights as are aspired for only by the best of men”


On the psychological front, the stigma of his perceived lineage never left him. It required Adhiratha, his father, to quote him the equally tragic story of Ekalavya to bring him out of depression into which Guru Dronacharya’s rejection for his enrolment for higher studies had pushed him. His psyche again suffered a setback when he was debarred from the tournament on the basis of his lineage, despite being the best performer of the day. Another big shock came his way in the Swayamvar of Draupadi. The biggest ambition of any warrior is to display his powers in battle. But cruel fate even denied him that privilege when he was forced to sit out of the Kurukshetra war for the first ten days. He might have looked 

normal from the outside but his inner personality was surely impacted by these and many other tragedies. Rejected and insulted by society at every step, he developed some flaws engendered by a defiant spirit and nurtured by association with the devil designs of Duryodhana, his benefactor prince. But those very things seem to enhance and enliven the appeal of his character. At every stage in his life he had to endure immense hardships and yet, never did he deter from the path of righteousness. The various sacrifices he made were only one aspect of his towering, though complex personality. Sometimes it was hard to believe to what extent he could drive himself to adhere to his principles of not sending anybody back empty-handed from his presence. His commitment to his principles generosity was so strong that he knew that he was virtually giving away his own life to Indra in the shape of his armor and earrings despite having been warned beforehand by Surya-deva, his

divine father. In another instance, he broke the sandalwood panels of his own palace for charity, when he could not otherwise procure the sandalwood demanded by an old Brahmin. Before him, all of the Kaurava, as well as Pandava princes, including Arjuna, had pleaded helplessness in meeting the Brahmin’s request because of the non-availability of sandalwood in Hastinapura. The commitment to his principles was so deeply embedded in his psyche that he could not breach the same even in the thick of battle and in his worst nightmares. Overall, all this made him a unique personality with no parallel among his contemporaries. Therefore Karna can be considered undoubtedly as the unsung hero of the Mahabharata.


Q-2 Is moral conflict and Hamartia there in Karna's character?


An ethical dilemma arises when a person is committed to two or more moral obligations and he cannot fulfill one without violating his duty to the other.


This is exactly what happened in the case of Karna in the episode ‘The Temptation of Karna’. At one point of time in the Mahabharata, Karna was also suffering from a great ethical dilemma. That was the decision making time for him, in which he had to choose between law (dharma) and his duty; between his mother and his friend. That was a hard time for karna where he could not obey his mother without violating his duty to his friend, at the same time he could not remain loyal to his friend without disobeying his duty as a son.



The Mahabharata which is wholly devoted to the classic and sublime scene in which Lord Krishna disclosed to Karna about his true descent, about his real mother and the secret of his birth. Just before the outbreak of Kurukshetra war, both Krishna and Kunti approached Karna and revealed the truth of his birth and urged him to join the Pandavas. Karna, for the first time, learnt about his true descent from Lord Krishna that he is not Radheya but Kunteya and five Pandavas are his brothers. 


After hearing this, Karna was shocked for a moment and he did not understand how to deal with this traumatic situation. He became so helpless that he 

started having an ethical dilemma- the dilemma of responsibilities both as a son and a friend. 


Krishna Visited Karna First and Tried to Tempt Him by offering Several Advantageous Choices which he Would Get by Joining Pandavas:


“Come with me and you shall be a king……Pandavas shall have to recognize you as the Kaunteya senior to Yudhisthira. The five pandavas shall clasp your feet as your brothers and so shall the five sons of Draupadi, and the unvanquished son of Subhadra mighty Bhimasena himself shall hold the grand white umbrella over you…Arjuna shall drive the chariot drawn by his white horses…Abhimanyu, Nakula, Sahadeva, and the five Draupadeyas shall always be at your beck and call…..”



Lord Krishna even offered him the company of Draupadi if he chose to side with pandavas “ and at the sixth turn you shall lie with Draupadi.” Krishna further said that he himself would follow Karna if he joined the Pandavas.


Karna refused to accept all the offerings of Lord Krishna, because he knew that it was too late for such offerings. Rather he was determined to stay with Duryodhana, because it was only Duryodhana who always stood behind him. When he was all alone, Duryodhan was the only person to come to his aid and he would never give him up. Karna also told Krishna that he considers Adhiratha and Radha as his real parents because they showered unconditional love on him, whereas Kunti cast him out as though he had been stillborn.


Even Karna request Vasudeva not to disclose their meeting in front of the Pandavas because if Yudhisthira learnt about the true identity of Karna, he would give away his kingdom to him, because he is a true dharma abiding person, and he (Karna) in turn would give to Duryodhana because of his friendship and loyalty.


When Lord Krishna Failed to Tempt Karna, Kunti came to Meet him and Revealed herself as his Mother:




“you are the son of Kunti, not of Radha, nor is Adhiratha your father, you have not been born in the line of …..I gave 

birth to you before I was married. You are my first-born whom I carried in my womb in the palace of Kuntibhoja. You are a 

Partha, my son...”



Thus, it is clear that the stone hearted mother, Kunti was trying to emotionally blackmail Karna so that he could join the Pandavas and fight for their cause. She revealed in front of him the untold truth and secret of his birth and accepted him as her son, not out of love but in order to protect the life of her legal sons. In reality, by inviting Karna into her son’s side she wanted to have a life-long protection and permanent armor (kavach) for her favorite sons. Had Kunti really loved Karna, she might have revealed his true identity in front of her five sons and begged Karna’s life instead. But she did not do that. If she had a really soft corner for her first born son, she would have accepted him in front of all at the time of Pandavas first military exhibition. Karna, for the first time, challenged Arjuna for archery competition but he was refused and was humiliated by all due to his low origin. Everyone, especially the 2nd , Bheema mocked him by saying that he does not have the efficiency of a warrior. It would be a dishonor for Arjuna if he fought with a suta. At that time, Kunti could have disclosed Karna’s true identity and saved her son from utter humiliation instead of remaining a silent audience of her son’s mockery. How selfish Kunti was! She remembered her first son just before the outbreak of war when Karna wholly determined to destroy the Pandavas troop.




Karna is a man of morals and values. Because he not only remained on the side of his friend, Duryodhana but also kept his promise throughout the battle, which he had made to his mother, Kunti, that he would not harm the Pandavas other than Arjuna. But at last, Karna was unable to defeat Arjuna and met his tragic end at the hands of his opponent, Arjuna, his soul enemy. Hence, no other character in Mahabharata is as morally strong as the Maharathi Karna. He is the most powerful, heroic, inexhaustible, enduring, and unbeatable of all characters.













{Words- 3, 301}
{pictures- 6}
{Video - 1}

Tuesday, September 19, 2023

Toru Dutt (Lakshman)

 


Toru Dutt (Lakshman),

Shri Aurobindo(To a Hero Worshiper)

R. Tagore (Dino Daan)



This blog is a task given by Megha ma'am Department of English M.K.B.U. In this blog we were assigned to write any question given in the task. In this blog I am going to write about the character of Sita portrayed by Toru Dutt in her poem Lakshman as it differs from the ideal image of Sita presented in The Ramayana. 



Toru Dutt



Toru Dutt (4 March 1856 – 30 August 1877) was an Indian Bengali translator and poet from British India, who wrote in English and French. She is among the founding figures of Indo-Anglian literature, alongside Henry Louis Vivian Derozio (1809–1831), Manmohan Ghose (1869–1924), and Sarojini Naidu (1879–1949). She is known for her volumes of poetry in English, Sita, A Sheaf Gleaned in French Fields (1876) and Ancient Ballads and Legends of Hindustan (1882), and for a novel in French, Le Journal de Mademoiselle d'Arvers (1879). Her poems explore themes of loneliness, longing, patriotism and nostalgia.

Born in Calcutta, Dutt was a precocious child who learned English, French, and Sanskrit at a young age. In 1869, her family moved to Europe, where she spent four years studying and traveling. Dutt returned to India in 1873 and began writing seriously. She published her first book of poems, A Sheaf Gleaned in French Fields, in 1876. Her second book of poems, Ancient Ballads and Legends of Hindustan, was published posthumously in 1882.

Dutt's poetry is notable for its blending of Indian and Western influences. She drew on her knowledge of Hindu mythology and folklore to create poems that were both exotic and accessible to English readers. Her work was praised by critics for its originality and its lyrical beauty.

Dutt died of tuberculosis in 1877 at the age of 21. Her early death was a tragedy for Indian literature, but her brief career left a lasting legacy. She is considered to be one of the most important figures in the development of Indo-Anglian poetry.

Introduction of the poem



The poem "Lakshman" is from Dutt's Ancient Ballads and Legends of Hindustan (1882). It tells a story from the Hindu epic Ramayana, in which the hero Rama is told to procure a golden deer for his wife, Sita. After Rama leaves Sita with his brother, Lakshman, for safekeeping, he finds out that the deer is actually a demon and kills it. However, when the demon dies, it calls out for help using Rama's own voice. Though Lakshman knows Rama is invincible and does not worry, Sita panics at the sound of the cry for help and asks Lakshman to go and investigate. So that he can both please Sita and also ensure that she stays put, as ordered by Rama, Lakshman draws a line in the ground that Sita is not to cross while he leaves to search for Rama. While he is absent, however, Sita crosses the line and is abducted by the demon king Ravana.

Q-Do you think the character of Sita portrayed by Toru Dutt in her poem Lakshman differs from the ideal image of Sita presented in The Ramayana?




Toru Dutt's portrayal of Sita in her poem "Lakshman" differs from the ideal image of Sita presented in The Ramayana in several ways.

One of the most notable differences is that Dutt's Sita is more human and vulnerable than the ideal Sita. In The Ramayana, Sita is often portrayed as a perfect goddess, who is always calm, composed, and unwavering in her faith. Dutt's Sita, on the other hand, is more complex and relatable. She is capable of feeling a wide range of emotions, including anger, fear, and despair.

Toru Dutt’s Lakshman captures this moment of failure in all the three characters of Ramayana. Sita accuses Lakshman for his delay in going out to save Rama. Sita’s mind changes and she accuses Lakshman of being disloyal to his brother” she accuses Lakshman by telling him that he wanted to marry his brother’s wife. There is a parallel narrative like this in Ramayana where Bali, the ruler of the vanara kingdom Kishkindha ostracized his brother Sugriva from his Kingdom and forcibly took Sugriva’s wife Ruma.

Sita’s character in the poem ‘Lakshman’ may not be strictly in keeping with her portrayal in the Ramayana, but it is in accordance with human nature, and shows the working of a woman’s mind. In the poem she does not appear as an idealized queen, but as a woman, who behaves as a woman in her condition ought to be. She acts impulsively and easily falls in the trap laid down for her by Ravana, the tricky and mighty king of Lanka. 

In the beginning Sita is mild, gentle and unsuspecting and has full faith in Lakshman’s sincerity and loyalty towards her and Rama. But later on her temper changes and she becomes wild and fierce in reaction to Laksman’s lethargy in action. Instead of feeling convinced by Lakshman’s arguments, Sita becomes suspicious of his words, and begins to doubt the very sincerity and truthfulness of his feelings towards her and Rama. Sita thinks that Lakshman has an evil eye on her and is an enemy in disguise. Further, she thinks that he wants Rama’s death, so that he may possess his wife for himself. She begins to hurl bitter sarcastic words at him, and openly accuses him of treachery, deceit, guilt, insincerity and cowardice. Side by side with Rama’s safety, she now begins to think of her own safety from the enemy in Lakshman.

Another difference between Dutt's Sita and the ideal Sita is that Dutt's Sita is more outspoken and assertive. In The Ramayana, Sita is typically portrayed as a submissive and obedient wife. She always follows Rama's instructions, even when she does not agree with them. Dutt's Sita, on the other hand, is more independent and willing to stand up for herself.

For example, when Lakshman tells Sita that he must go out to help Rama, Sita refuses to let him go. She is terrified of being left alone in the forest, and she begs Lakshman to stay with her. Lakshman tries to reason with her, but Sita refuses to listen. She tells him that she is his mistress and that he must obey her commands.

This scene shows that Dutt's Sita is not afraid to challenge authority, even when that authority comes from someone she loves and respects. She is a strong and independent woman who is willing to stand up for her own needs and desires.

Finally, Dutt's Sita is more complex and nuanced than the ideal Sita. In The Ramayana, Sita is often portrayed as a one-dimensional character. She is the perfect wife, the perfect mother, and the perfect goddess. Dutt's Sita, on the other hand, is a more well-rounded character. She has strengths and weaknesses, and she is capable of making mistakes.

For example, when Sita first sees the golden deer, she is immediately infatuated with it. She begs Rama to catch it for her, even though Rama knows that the deer is a demon in disguise. Sita's infatuation with the deer leads to her abduction by Ravana, and it is one of the main causes of the conflict in The Ramayana.

This scene shows that Dutt's Sita is not perfect. She is capable of making mistakes, and she is not always immune to temptation. However, her mistakes do not make her any less of a person. She is still a loving wife, a devoted mother, and a courageous woman.

conclusion

In conclusion, Toru Dutt's portrayal of Sita in her poem "Lakshman" differs from the ideal image of Sita presented in The Ramayana in several ways. Dutt's Sita is more human and vulnerable, more outspoken and assertive, and more complex and nuanced than the ideal Sita. These differences make Dutt's Sita a more relatable and believable character.

Some important points:

  • Dutt's Sita is more human and vulnerable than the ideal Sita.

  • Dutt's Sita is more outspoken and assertive than the ideal Sita.

  • Dutt's Sita is more complex and nuanced than the ideal Sita.

  • Dutt's Sita is a more relatable and believable character.

It is also important to note that Dutt's poem was written in the late 19th century, a time when there was a growing movement for women's rights in India. Dutt's portrayal of Sita can be seen as a reflection of this movement, as she presents Sita as a strong and independent woman who is not afraid to challenge authority.

here i embed one video which can help you to better understand this poem.


Sources

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toru_Dutt#:~:text=Toru%20Dutt%20(Bengali%3A%20%E0%A6%A4%E0%A6%B0%E0%A7%81%20%E0%A6%A6%E0%A6%A4%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%A4,%2C%20longing%2C%20patriotism%20and%20nostalgia.


Stewart, Amber. Alex Spencer Cohen ed. "Toru Dutt: Poetry “Lakshman” Summary and Analysis". GradeSaver, 16 May 2020 Web. 19 September 2023.


T, Meenakshi. “Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL).” The Protected Threat - A Reading of Toru Dutt’s Poem “Lakshman,” vol. 4, no. 2016, 2016, doi:10.33329/rjelal.








[Words-1,511]
[Pictures- 3]
[Video-1]























Sunday, September 17, 2023

Sunday Reading Task

 

Sunday Reading Task

Talk by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichi


Dilip Barad sir, the Head of the English Department, has designated a special Sunday reading task. We are tasked with viewing three videos featuring Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and reflecting on the knowledge gained from them. This exercise aims to deepen our understanding and provoke thoughtful insights.


Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie




Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie was born on 15 September 1977. She is a Nigerian writer whose works include novels, short stories and nonfiction. She was described in The Times Literary Supplement as "the most prominent" of a "procession of critically acclaimed young anglophone authors" of Nigerian fiction who are attracting a wider audience, particularly in her second home, the United States.


Adichie has written several novels, among which 

Short stories, the book-length essays We Should All Be Feminists (2014) and Dear Ijeawele, or A Feminist Manifesto in Fifteen Suggestions (2017), and a memoir , Notes on Grief (2021).

In 2008, she was awarded a MacArthur Genius Grant. She was the recipient of the PEN Pinter Prize in 2018. She was recognized as one of the BBC's 100 women of 2021.

In 2002, she was shortlisted for the Caine Prize for African Writing for her short story "You in America", and her story "That Harmattan Morning" was selected as a joint winner of the 2002 BBC World Service Short Story Awards. In 2003, she won the David T. Wong International Short Story Prize 2002/2003 (PEN Center Award).

She is a good speaker and she conveys her thoughts and knowledge in an interesting manner. We were assigned to watch three videos and try to put our understanding from it.


1) Talk on the Importance of Story / Literature.



Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's TED Talk, "The Danger of a Single Story," explores the importance of stories and literature in shaping our understanding of the world and ourselves. She argues that when we hear only one story about a person, group, or place, it can lead to harmful stereotypes and misunderstandings.

In this talk she identifies herself as a storyteller, and she introduces herself. She started reading at age of four, she read  British and American children's books. She started writing at the age of seven, she wrote exactly the kinds of stories she was reading. All her characters were white and blue-eyed. They played in the snow. They ate apples, and they talked a lot about the weather, how lovely it was that the sun had come out. Now, this despite the fact that she lived in Nigeria. She had never been outside Nigeria. They didn't have snow. They ate mangoes,and they never talked about the weather, because there was no need to.

So as a child she loved to read this kind of book, by this we get to know how impressionable and vulnerable we are. As a child she had the perception that every book had white people characters and there were no books which had black skin characters. Then she got to know about writers like Chinua Achebe and Camara Laye, by reading them she changed her thought that there were also black skin characters in literature.

When she was 19 she left Nigeria to go to university in the United States. Her American roommate was shocked by her. She asked where she had learned to speak English so well, and was confused when she said that Nigeria happened to have English as its official language. Her roommate had all perceptions from western literature.

For an example there was a quote from the writing of a London merchant called John Locke, who sailed to west Africa in 1561, and kept a fascinating account of his voyage. After referring to the black Africans as "beasts who have no houses," he writes, "They are also people without heads, having their mouth and eyes in their breasts."

in the words of the wonderful poet, Rudyard Kipling, is

 "half devil, half child."

So this is how they portray black people in western literature,  that is how they create a single story, show people as one thing, as only one thing, over and over again, and that is what they become. That is how Adichi's roommate has another perception for black people because she only reads  western literature. She also discusses how the single story of Africa in Western literature has often been one of poverty, war, and disease, while ignoring the continent's rich and diverse cultures and histories. So this is how Adichie shares personal anecdotes and examples from literature to illustrate her points.

Adichie argues that stories matter because they have the power to shape our imaginations and our empathy. When we read stories about people who are different from us, it can help us to see the world from their perspectives and to understand their experiences. This, in turn, can lead to greater compassion and understanding.

Learning output

-👉Stories matter because they have the power to shape our imaginations and our empathy.

-👉When we hear only one story about a person, group, or place, it can lead to harmful stereotypes and misunderstandings.

-👉We should seek out and listen to multiple stories about the world around us, so that we can develop a more complex and nuanced understanding of reality.

Her conclusion responds to these misconceptions by reiterating the importance of spreading diverse stories in opposition to focusing on just one. She professes that the rejection of the single story phenomenon allows one to “regain a kind of paradise” and see people as more than just one incomplete idea.

2) We should All be Feminist.



In this Ted Talk Adichie discusses contemporary feminism through the lens of her own experiences as a woman and a citizen of Nigeria. She gave a thirty minute speech. She talks about feminism in the post-colonial world. She also uses theoretical concepts that permeate gender studies, even though she does not necessarily refer to them directly. Adichie explicitly describes gender as socially constructed rather than inherently rooted in biology and examines how attitudes toward culture in the post-colonial world may reinforce gender oppression, but uses a simplified definition of feminism.

Worth Mentioning Things in her speech.


The first thing that becomes evident from Adichie’s TED Talk is that the author perceives gender as a social construct rather than something inherently based on human biology.


There was one incident which became evident in her discussion of a restaurant waiter who greeted men and not women and assumed a woman cannot have money of her own, but only those given by a man. Adichie remarks that the waiter acts under the influence of his learned assumptions about gender, which taught him to perceive women as unimportant compared to men. 


It is also interesting how she approaches the term “feminism” and the concept of feminism. Both the title and contents of the speech suggest that feminism as an ideology and practice is not something limited by gender: just as there are women indifferent to feminism, there are also feminist men. For Adichie, the only thing necessary to qualify as a feminist is recognizing the problem with gender and aspiring to fix it, regardless of whether the person in question is a man or woman. She cements this assumption by revealing at the end of her speech that her brother is the best feminist she knows. However, this approach to defining feminism is oversimplified, as Kimmel points out in “Real Men Join the Movement.” 


In her talk she mentioned one incident, one evening she and her friend Louise went out and there she was impressed by one hardworking person who is parking cars. She gave him a tip and he said "Thank you" to Louise, not to Adichi. That parking man thought that this money was not her, because not every woman was independent. The man believed that whatever money she had had ultimately come from Louis. Because Louis is a man.


Learning outcome


In this talk she mentioned that masculinity of all men is not all about being hard and being emotionless. Every mother has to teach her boy to cook for his sister, not every time a girl has to cook for her brother. Girls and boys get the same amount of money, not always boys should pay bills, girls can also have to pay bills. So this is how girls and boys, men and women were treated equally and led to their responsibility.

 

Today we live in a vastly different world. The person more likely to lead is not the physically stronger person, it is the more creative person, the more intelligent person, the more innovative person, and there are no hormones for those attributes. A man is as likely as a woman to be intelligent, to be creative, to be innovative. 


So in simple words feminism is not always about Women empowerment but it is also about Men's empowerment.


Conclusion


This is how Adichi talks about many profound concepts in gender studies, even though it does not always elaborate them at length. To begin with, the author consistently refers to gender as constructed to assign social positions rather than objectively rooted in human biology. This approach is entirely in line with the notion of gender as a social construct. 


3)Talk on the Importance of Truth in the Post Truth Era.


In her talk at Harvard University on the importance of truth in the post-truth era, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie argues that truth is essential for a functioning democracy and for a just and equitable society. She defines truth as "that which is true, regardless of what anyone believes or says."

Adichie opened her remarks with an anecdote about a presenter who once, after devotedly practicing the proper pronunciation of Adichie’s name, accidentally introduced her as “chimichanga.” She said the moment taught her the importance of understanding the origin of ideas and actions.

“The point of this story is not to say that you can call me ‘chimichanga’—don’t even think about it—the point is that intent matters, that context matters,” she said. “We now live in a culture of calling out, a culture of outrage. And you should call people out, you should be outraged. But always remember context and never disregard intent.”

She urges us to be critical thinkers and to evaluate information carefully before accepting it as true. She also encourages us to speak out against lies and misinformation, and to support institutions that promote truth and accountability.

Here is a simple language summary of Adichie's main points:

>Truth is essential for a functioning democracy and for a just and equitable society.

>In the post-truth era, we are increasingly bombarded with false information and disinformation.

>We must be critical thinkers and evaluate information carefully before accepting it as true.

>We must speak out against lies and misinformation, and support institutions that promote truth and accountability.

Adichie's talk is a powerful reminder of the importance of truth in a time when it is under attack. She challenges us to be vigilant in our defense of truth and to hold ourselves and others accountable for speaking the truth.






(Words-1855)

(Pictutes-1)

(Videos-3)